Category |
|
Competencies |
Scoring |
Organization |
1.1 |
The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience |
Fails to provide appropiate level of style and presentation for the audience directed to |
Presentation is presented in adequate way the target audience can consume |
Clearly meets and goes beyond to identify the level and style of presentation expected by audience |
1.2 |
Information is presented in a logical sequence |
Presentation has no flow and is difficult to maintain connection to the topic |
Presentation provides consistent connection from each slide |
Presentation has a clearly defined flow and no gaps in message |
Content |
2.1 |
Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the presentation. |
Fails to provide context to audience on what will be presentated and has no visual highlights (pictures) to grab attention of audience |
provides context to audience on what will be presentated but does not grab attention of audience |
Grabs the audience attention with a clearly defined objective of what will be presented and provides visual highlights (pictures) that provides supporting cotent |
2.2 |
Presentation contains accurate information. |
Information was irrelevant and off topic. Failed to display any knowledge and understanding of topic |
Information was suitable for the topic and provided a sense of general summary level understanding of knowledge. |
Information was detailed and provided sense of high level of knoweledge about the topic |
2.3 |
Material included is relevant to the overall message/purpose |
Material/concepts does not have any relevance or connection to the topic, confusing audience |
Material/concepts relates to the overall message to the topic |
Material/concepts have a clearly understood connection to the topic and is easy to consume by audience |
2.4 |
Appropriate amount of material is prepared, and points made reflect well their relative importance. |
Material presented lacks depth and shows little amount of effort or time allocated |
Material shows adequate amount of research and effort was performed |
Material provides indepth amount of time and effort needed in order to address topic |
2.5 |
There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation. |
Fails to provide summary of content covered thus leading to confusion from audience on if they received information needed to undertstand objective/topic |
Provides a generalized conclusion that gives audience a feeling of satisifaction |
Clear and concise conclusion allowed audience to not have any concerns or confused if topic/objective was met |
2.6 |
Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience. |
No understanding or context of terms is provided leaving audience confused |
Context of technical terms is is generalized to be understood by audience |
Content provides clear understanding of technical terms allowing audience no questions or confusion |
Presentation |
3.1 |
Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, movement, etc.). |
No eye contact is made with audience and speakers body language is stiff |
Speaker is speaking to audience directly most of the time but body language is not animated |
Speaker provides clear engagement with audience and has animated and shows confidence with appropriate level of animation |
3.2 |
Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. |
Speaker mumbles or does not speak loud enough for entire duration of presentation |
Speaker is able to be heard some of the time, may change pitch during presentation |
Speaker is consistantly able to be heard for duration of presentation |
3.3 |
Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. |
Presentation ended significantly early or extended well beyond time frame showing lack of preparedness |
Presentation ended within appropriate timeframe seemed rushed or elongated |
Presentation length was ideal for the amount of content covered |
3.4 |
Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. |
Presenters showed lack of confidence and no preparation. |
Presenters showed relative confidence and preparation. May tried to have rushed thru. |
Presenters showed high confidence or significant preparation. Was smooth and calm in their delivery. |